Imagine investing involuntarily a seagull with the machine, get off the car and you see that this has a wing injury and fails to take flight. Do you feel morally obliged to help him, and moreover I have also read somewhere that if you do not provide relief might get into trouble. Thus began a series of phone calls and rebounds from one PBX to try to figure out what you can do to save the hapless bird. Your civic sense and your humanity out front off phones and numbers that ring hollow, so that you come home with a weight on my conscience that will torment you for days: what will become of that poor animal was that you were not able to rescue?
From July 1 ENPA, after twenty years of hard work, has completed the recovery activities wound wildlife. A choice conditioned by the non-generational volunteers, They say from home via Marchesetti. It is thankfully still guaranteed the activity of the Wild Animal Recovery Center with the reception of the animals that want to lead by good Samaritans 8.00 all 12.00 and from 14.00 all 20.00 everyday.
The relief in the area is done in fits and starts from the regional forestry body, but often the dedicated mobile ring hollow or are off. For a distress call that a citizen has told us that he did, forest responded that he had too little staff to ensure so many requests.
E’ Clearly the situation is very serious, but what is worse is that regional policies have a very different vision of what we imagine to rescue. The State Law 157/92 provides in fact that the regions normino rescue to wildlife in difficulty, but the way this application took place in Friuli Venezia Giulia is unbelievable. The Regional Law 7/13 It has in fact indicated only that the recovery activities during hunting or as a result of traffic accident or other causes may be carried out by hunters and their dogs to track. E’ ragionevole pensare che le richieste di soccorso in ambiente urbano difficilmente verranno svolte dai cacciatori e che difficilmente qualcuno chiamerebbe un cacciatore per dare delle cure ad animali in difficoltà . The law 28/17 also it scheduled to be issued a regulation that clearly put on the activity of wound wildlife recovery, but to date this rule does not exist. Accordingly, the good citizen that takes the injured gull and ENPA door moves to the margins of legality for the “state of necessity” that in a hypothetical dispute could go in his favor, but without a provision that clearly protects.
The commissioner responsible Stefano Zannier, He tried to play down announcing an expression of interest for the rescue service management of wildlife animals on the road which was to end in time for the handover of July 1, But this did not happen. And the losers are always the weakest: injured animals or in trouble.
Photo of a rescue carried out the 16 July 2018 from local un'animalista to which we give our thanks
Leave a Reply